VOTING: WHAT''S THE DIFFERENCE

The upcoming 2016 Philippine presidential and vice-presidential elections has segregated and divided the Filipino people into various factions; each with the belief that a specific candidate holds the solutions to the current predicament of the nation. Of course, the reality to the overall dissent is due to their subjective interests. There are those who live in poverty and instantaneously accept the proposal of Jejomar Binay to abolish income taxes and provide them aid and assistance. Those who have become victims of crime and corruption, or bear sympathy for others like them; will opt for Rodrigo Duterte who claims that he will efface the existence of such injustice in a period of six months. Women and feminist groups that may have experienced abuse in their jobs and homes will support Grace Poe and her campaign to fight for womens’ rights. And the group of frustrated commuters who find it an arduous task of getting to, and returning from, work or suffer the unfavorable nuances of traffic congestion will revere Mar Roxas and his fantasitic ideas of erecting new and speedier railway systems.

    After all these hype, when a president is finally chosen; one side will exhale their cheers while the rest will sign in frustration. In the period, perhaps just a few months after the elections; nothing definite or prominent will come about. Whichever of the candidates come into office; they will always for short of fulfilling their promises or not carry them out at all. As a consequence, they will be condomned and criticized by the very same people who put them in office; as well as those who despised them at the onset.

    So what is the relevance of elections?

    This is just an event, or practice, that Filipinos have accepted into their lives; just as holidays and celebrations. It is something that has been integrated in the society and must eventually-and inevitably-happen. The masses have the option to vote or not. It is like being given free tickets to a concert of a performer that one may not have heard of. Come to the show or not. Be pleased with the artists, or otherwise. Whatever happens, when people step out of the venue, their lives go on; and they find out that their troubles and burdens are still there.

NEW WORLD, MAD WORLD

 “Come mothers and fathers throughout the land,

 And don’t criticize what you don’t understand,

 Your sons and your daughters are beyond your command,

 Your old road is rapidly aging,

 So get out of the new one if you can’t lend a hand,

 For the times, they are a-changing…”

    -Bob Dylan

________________

    In the mid-1990’s, I owned a VHS player and a membership card at a Video City branch in a nearby mall; and enjoyed the privilege of keeping up-or catching up-with mod films in the comfort of my home. Come the dawn of the twenty-first century, the video rental shop began to phase out the cumbersome VHS tapes for compact VCD’s, to my chagrin. I criticized their inconsideration for people without disc players, and rhetorically asked how I was supposed to patronize their new products. A passive response insinuated that I would just have to keep up with the times and get myself a VCD player.

    When I was a child during the 70’s, there was a televised advertisement of a sanitary napkin with a woman walking along a beach or bay (1); I forget which exactly. Underarm deodorants were endorsed without showing the specific body area it would be applied to. In films, a protagonist would fire a gun at his enemy who would simply drop to the ground immobile; and the credits ran up the screen. Romantic presentations displayed heterosexual lovers kissing and shedding upper garments; then the scene faded leaving the viewer to imagine what came next (2). Such were the conservative practices of the media back then as compared to the present where women’s buttocks are shown, garbed in fit trousers to emphasize the reliability of a specific brand of feminine pads (3). Skin whiteners are endorsed by models boldly exposing their armpits to show the efficiency of a product. Action films have more realistically vulgar images, i.e. heads lopped off shoulders, intestines dangling out of abdomens, generous amounts of blood flow, etc. And theatrical productions of comic book superheroes have characters flamboyantly practicing lesbianism and sexual intercourse (4). Of course, Manoling Morato’s term as MTRCB chairman was no longer a reality then.

    After I revealed my android phone to elder relatives-(born during the Second World War and favoring Clark Gable over Denzel Washington for the role of a naval officer (5)-they produced cellphones in the genre of 3310’s; and insisted that such units are more convenient as compared to newer, complex ones. I presume their opinions were made to conceal the fact that a touch-screen unit was too difficult for their arthritic digits to operate. Perhaps if such technological apparatus were introduced by the Japanese in 1943, they would have had more optimistic appraisals for it.

      Enter; the topic of same-sex marriage. There is an unarguable possibility that even during antediluvian periods, homosexuals already existed; otherwise there would be no predecessors to instigate gay relationships in the world. Back then, conflicts on this matter would most likely have been contained within closed quarters of family and acquaintances. But as with the Greenpeace movement and the rights of blacks; gays have chosen to demand the legalization and induction of their practice among current issues. This move eventually inspired publicised dissent between people who share common sentiments: some living by the principles of the Old Testament; and others with the open-mindedness of the Pope or Harvey Milk. It is quite obvious that ‘the American way’ HAS enhanced its influence on the Philippines in the passing of time.

    Impartial commentators, spiritual leaders, or public figures may suggest that everyone has a right to their own opinion. And that judging others is contradictory to the teachings of Christianity. They suggest diplomacy and tactfully expressed views; respecting those of others, though contradictory to our own. The main root of all such conflicts, however, is not really attributive to the sentiments of each individual but rather; to the reality of CHANGE and FREE WILL.

    Change alters everything in existence but is indifferent to the minds of human beings. It does not eliminate free will. It has neither a communist or fascist characteristic that instills an overall compliance upon all rational homo sapiens. A number would opt to cling to the antiquated while others choose to keep in stride; each party stressing the logic of their opinions; hence, the dissent and chaos.

    Neither Manny Pacquiao and Nike, or those for and against the reproductive health bill, are to blame for their opposing estimations. (Imagine technological entrepreneurs who, in the near future, may suggest uploading Biblical verses into USB devices or websites thus making ‘The Good Book’ an obsolete term; and those who will oppose their ideas.) As of the present, the individual responsible for ‘change’ and ‘free will’ has not yet been ascertained for the lynch mob or hangmen to execute. Even if discovered and eliminated, there shall inevitably exist contradicting views regarding its expungement; because conflict is an omnipresent reality of life.

________________

1. Stayfree

2. ‘The Young and the Restless’

3. Modess

4. ‘Watchmen’

5. ‘Run Silent, Run Deep’/‘Crimson Tide’

THE FILIPINO JEWISH QUALITY

    A subjective opinion is often the result of enthusiasm dwelling on a limited perspective or personal interests. In the 2004 elections, Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo fell to the disfavor of many Filipinos after she was suspected of having manipulated ballots which could have allowed Fernando Poe, Jr. to become the new president of the Philippines. For six more years, she retained her office as head-of-state; under the criticisms of the masses who constantly sought every opportunity and reason for the defamation of her office. Near the conclusion of 2009, a presumed ‘savior’ or ‘champion’ in the person of Benigno S. Aquino III was applauded by the people; one whose noble accomplishments were considered in comparison to the flaws and wrongs of the Macapagal-Arroyo administration. The overwhelming impression of his image even got him on the cover of a LIFE magazine with the caption “Can Noynoy Save The Philippines?” Years into his presidency, a negative clamor arose because of the people’s dissatisfaction with regards to his performance; and many of the unfavorable incidents which occurred in the country were blamed on his assumed ‘inefficiency’. The term “Noynoying” eventually became an addition to the Filipino vocabulary, insinuating the act of impassively resting a head on one’s hand and doing nothing.

    The corporate lords and influential businessmen in the Makati area, as well as motorists that enjoy the conveniences of a ‘budget-exceeding’ parking structure will, most likely, give their support to the candidacy of Jejomar Binay. The Davaoeños who pride themselves with the dramatic fall of crime rate and increased order in their city will sing the praises of Rodrigo Duterte and hold him up to the heavens much higher than the Holy Father in the Vatican. Followers of ‘Noynoy’ Aquino who have benefited from his achievements will evince plaudits and fervor for his disciple, Mar Roxas. And perhaps, those who appreciate romanticism suggestive of Luke Skywalker (1) and Sally Jupiter (2) will give their heartfelt support to Grace Poe.

    People live with the reality of “trial and error”. But unlike scientists and inventors, they do not bear an impartial demeanor: every faction has their own specific interests, needs, and wants which inspire their subjective opinions. The election of a president is intended for the welfare the entire nation, not merely a segment of it. This is not evident with regards to the individuals who pan for candidates that have only served their purposes, but not those of others. Hence, there exist those who are disheartened, or infuriated, when their ‘champion’ is not put on the throne.

    There is another reality, however, which can be attributed to Filipinos which many of them have not taken note, or become aware, of. It is their ever-fluctuating and inconsistent fervor. They are like the Jews who welcomed Jesus with palms waving in the air, then condemning Him to death later on. With Philippine politics, no matter how impressive the reputation and accomplishments of a person; when, or if, that poor soul attains the status of president; he (or she) stands on a pedestal open to mockery and scorn.

    If Fate is kind, the individual might just retain the sympathy and forgiveness of his (or her) followers.

1-Star Wars Episode 6: Return of the Jedi

2-Watchmen

    

NOT ALL WHO HAS AUTHORITY IS WORTHY OF IT

        In 2014, after I had exhausted my patience and strength at lulling my son to sleep, I became aware of a ruckus from the gate of the apartment building I resided in. A man was boisterously calling out to the residents to let him in the premises; slamming on and shaking the gate with emphatic determination. My neighbors who lived at the ground floor ignored the individual, but he persistently hollered his demand. The commotion caused my son to stir and moan. So I went out to the balcony and shouted an admonishment at the person who, as it turned out, was the designated collector of the monthly dues.

     To clarify the subject: this ‘fee’ was conjured by the so-called “homeowners association” for the development, maintenance, and security of the subdivision. In the area, there were those who owned houses, stores, and apartment buildings; and those who rented space in the apartments. Earlier, tenants protested that they were not homeowners and hence, they were not obliged to pay anything more than their rent. The homeowners association retaliated to this by designating a reputed tough-guy to collect the tribute; one indirectly given the authority to bully anyone into obedience and discourage any possible questions or arguments from being raised. And so I found myself staring down at the ruffian who had his finger pointed at me; reprimanding me for yelling at him and demanding I open the gate immediately.

    It was not difficult to see the fellow hated me. His scorn was inspired during one of his earlier visits when I asked him what the self-proclaimed “association” was doing about the inconsiderate behavior of certain residents who reveled with karaoke machines from dusk till dawn; and pointed out that no additional lighting or repairs were administered to the streets. When he could not placate my inquiries with his shallow roughneck remarks, he turned away and advised that it would be best for me to keep my opinions to myself. On the day of our temper-induced exchange; his companion reminded me to take caution and choose wisely the people I decided to confront: “Mag-ingat ka. Piliin mo kung sino inaaway mo”. Clearly, that was a threat. He was insinuating that I would get in trouble if I ‘pissed off’ his superior: the pot-bellied and immodest loudmouth who, in fact, was one among the discordant residents.

     Consider other aspects of the abuse of authority and how it is utilized for intimidation: an aggressive individual who will point a gun at a fellow motorist who he disagrees with; a traffic officer who makes use of a badge to extort money from drivers of public utility vehicles; a politician who silences the media and/or other factions of society by siccing hired killers or lawmen against them; or even a parent who will not tolerate any arguments from a child, no matter how rational, because the latter lives under his roof.

    As pessimistic as it may seem, this is a truth, a reality in the Philippines. In this country, might is right; not the other way around. If you don’t have any ‘connections’, influences, or authority; you are oftentimes in the wrong or irrelevant. Everyone has imperfections and faults. But why vote for people who refuse to be criticized or challenged for their flaws and shortcomings by the use of force, intimidation; or abuse of authority; those from the rank of president to the common “barangay tanod”?

    This is not to suggest that the ‘little people’ should be given the opportunity to disrespect and insult their leaders. A lot of the said individuals are also uneducated and uncultured with their behavior and manners. But every person deserves the right to be heard and taken seriously, especially when he or she has a point.

    Every once in a while, when I cannot comprehend the trials and burdens I go through, I tend to challenge God to explain to me about the nuances of my life. Of course, I do not get any answers. But I do not have to worry about ending up in the river or buried in some uncultivated land area either.

BONG-BONG MARCOS AND GRACE POE: AN IRRELEVANT ISSUE FOR THE FILIPINO NATION

    The media wants to inspire the focus of the Filipino audience by presenting issue which are rather irrelevant to the nation's welfare or development. And the people tend to focus on subjects which seem intriguing but not practical; because other than what is realistic and important; the masses are also inclined to focus on what tickles their fancy.

    Years ago, Princess Diana experienced an accident which took her life as well as that of her lover's. Of course the Filipino people were glued to their television sets and focused on the articles in the tabloids and newspapers which narrated information of the mentioned topic. During the present, this pointless fervor is repeating itself in the form of another current topic of intrigue: the possibility that Bong-Bong Marcos and Grace Poe are siblings from a common father.

    What is the point to all this?

    If Ferdinand Marcos was a father to both individuals, or not; it does not change anything in Philippine politics. The two individuals apparently do not like to ally themselves with one another for the upcoming elections; and they still hold different ideals and goals. Moreover, whether or not they are brother and sister; this does not solve the current social problems and burdens.

    What do the people think? That a person can evade extortion concerning the "laglag bala" scam if he or she told the surveillance officer that Bong-Bong and Grace were siblings; maybe develop a cordiality with the official which will cause the latter to disregard the bullet discovered in the tourist's suitcase? Or that one motorist will be given way by another in a traffic jam if they open their windows and say "Did you know that Ferdinand Marcos had a bastard daughter?"

    Nothing is gained, and nothing is altered for the good or the bad, by learning of something that is not significant for the Filipino people and their country. Perhaps the media should report more relevant issues and, eventually, inspire the people to set their attention on matters that make a difference.

WHY VOTING IS POINTLESS IN THE PHILIPPINES

“SO TRUE; FUNNY HOW IT SEEMS…”- Tony Hudley, Spandau Ballet

Why do people have to vote; or participate in elections?

The answer is very simple: to appoint leaders expected to function for the good of the nation. Without these individuals in designated offices, chaos and disorder is inevitable. Or such is the accepted premise in democratic countries. But does voting really have any relevance in the Philippines?

People sacrifice their time and energy at overcrowded venues; the names of their favored candidates floating in their minds or listed in a sheet of memo pad. They cast their votes, and offer prayers for their prospective candidate. Some vote because they have subjective opinions of personalities and believe that doing so will sate their ‘nationalist’ ideals. Others do so because they were influenced by gratuities such as petty amounts of cash or goods; or were enamored by colorfully romantic, but empty, speeches. However, they eventually learn that the person they voted for did not win; or that they were mistaken about the same.

In 1965, reputed war hero, Ferdinand Marcos became president of the Philippines. But because of his tyrannical demeanor; he was overthrown by a woman who would succeed him as the first female president of the country. Corazon Aquino merited the enthusiasm of the Filipinos for being the widow of an anticipated savior; their fervor the instrument for her successful overthrow of the despot. She was cherished until accused of being a puppet of the United States; and suffered the criticism of the very same people who sang her praises. Fidel Ramos, Joseph Estrada, Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo and Benigno Aquino III, likewise began terms revered as prophets at the outset; and condemned for their faults and shortcoming later on.

It is a pathetic reality for Filipinos to be adept at finding something to use against politicians who have fallen, or are, out of their favor. Woeful are those who fall short of their expectations; more so are those whose fraudulent conspiracies are exposed to the public eye. If Pope Francis ever became a valid candidate for the elections, his beloved image would most likely be lost after the Filipinos make him head-of-state.

It is probable that ardent voters judge this commentary as anti-social or non-conformist. That is because they refuse to admit the truth regarding their character. Elections are merely a formality of assigning persons to office by what is assumed as a democratic, ‘orderly procedure’. That is unarguably its sole purpose. However, the conventional attitude of Filipinos hinders it from having any other logical, or rational, meaning.

ROCKS AND HARD PLACES

ROCKS AND HARD PLACES

    The black man stopped to stare at the poster on a wall when he was treading the sidewalk. It was a promotion ad put there by the US Navy to encourage citizens to join their group.  The words which dwelt on patriotism, privileges and benefits lined the sheet of paper; strong enough to excite his ambitions. He reflected on his life and weighed the odds, then decided that in comparison to his monotonous and often trying predicament; the Navy might just offer him something better. He was tired of living a monotonous and pointless life under his father’s roof; under the pretense of being cared for and protected from the harsh realities of the world, but was actually being restrained by a fascist-minded individual, as was his estimation of the circumstance he was in.

    Contrary to the advice and protestations of his parent, he went to the town hall where naval recruiters coaxed at curious male onlookers and passersby-playing at their ardor with speeches about nobility, honor, and promising remunerations. After convincing himself that this was a better alternative, he fell in line and got himself enlisted.

    After surpassing the training period and being assigned to sea; he found himself billeted in the kitchen of a warship with others from his race; including some minorities of Hispanic and Asian descent. Every now and then, officers would verbally abuse him and give arduous and demeaning orders to carry out; such as wiping the floors of frequently used passageways or cleaning the latrine. Not to mention the occasional insults and derogatory statements thrown at him by Caucasian seamen.

    On one voyage, the captain of the ship unintentionally made a critical error by ordering the vessel to sail in turbulent waters which was caused by a storm. The black man was astounded when the destroyer tilted sideways more than its allotted rolling angle. When it righted, the ship lurched forward; stern astoundingly higher than its bow which was momentarily submerged underwater. Before the ship leveled, another wave slammed against the middle deck and pushed the ship beneath the tempestuous waters. The panic-stricken seaman watched as his section of the ship flooded up.

    When the storm abated, there were serious damages discovered on the ship which had to be repaired immediately as a precaution for any other potential storm surges. The sailor and his beleaguered peers were dispatched to attend the repairs. He thought it quite unfair that just because he was part of the crew, he had to stand for the mistakes of inept officers despite their having treated him ignominiously. Upon considering his situation, he found himself in a three-way dilemma: (1) He could not return to his father because he knew the old man would consistently rant at him about his impertinent decision. (2) He was in the middle of a chaotic sea on a battered ship sailing through a storm, and he had to endure that predicament because there was nowhere else he could go. (3) He could jump off the ship; be rid of his commitment to the navy and, most likely, die without having to hear the repetitively condescending admonishment of his father.

    Cuba Gooding, Jr., in two theatrical films (“MEN OF HONOR” and “PEARL HARBOR”) portrayed the lives of two African Americans who were historically involved with the United States Navy: Carl Brashear and Dorian Miller, respectively. They both joined the navy for reasons concerning dignity, self-respect and ambition. Brashear retired a decorated officer and holds the record for the first black naval diver. After Dorian Miller was awarded a medal for his courageous actions during the attack on Pearl Harbor, nothing else of significance was heard of him.

     Coming upon crossroads is an inevitable part of life. Sometimes, we may think one path is more advantageous than the other and later find ourselves mistaken. And when we stand before consecutive “forks in the road”, there are no longer any favorable alternatives to choose from.